For the second straight year, I’ll have the privilege of voting for the Poker Hall of Fame. This prestigious award is given to deserving candidates who meet four criteria: “Played poker against acknowledged top competition; played for high stakes; played consistently well, gaining the respect of peers; stood the test of time; or, for non-players, contributed to the overall growth and success of the game of poker, with indelible positive and lasting results.”
The 33-member panel, which consists of the 16 living Poker Hall of Fame members and 17 media representatives, can select as many of the 10 final candidates as they deem worthy of admission. Here are my thoughts on each of the 10 finalists as they appear in alphabetical order:
Chris Ferguson: There’s something to be said for a man who was influential in developing the software for one of the world’s largest online poker sites, Full Tilt. The former World Series of Poker (WSOP) Main Event champ has five bracelets and over $5 million in career WSOP earnings. He’s one of the game’s most recognizable faces due to his “Jesus” persona and, at 47, also has a National Heads-Up Poker Championship title under his belt. He’s worthy of consideration to the Poker Hall of Fame and would be my fourth favorite selection among the finalists.
Barry Greenstein: Despite having more than $2 million in WSOP earnings and three bracelets, Greenstein may best be known for igniting the move for generosity away from the felts. Greenstein has become known as the “Robin Hood of Poker,” but lacks the sparkling poker resume that the other nine Poker Hall of Fame candidates hold. However, I have little doubt that Greenstein, like Ferguson, will be inducted as part of a future class.
Jennifer Harman: Fresh off an induction into the Women in Poker Hall of Fame, Harman owns two WSOP bracelets, neither of which came in a Ladies event. She’s made two World Poker Tour (WPT) final tables and is approaching the $1 million mark in earnings on the WPT. Harman is a perfect fit for the Women in Poker Hall of Fame and her charity work will undoubtedly earn her a nod in the future, but she is not among my top choices for the Poker Hall of Fame Class of 2010.
Dan Harrington: The man who quite literally wrote the book on poker, Harrington’s “Hold’em” series can be found on the bookshelves of serious players around the world. Despite massive fields, Harrington made the final table of the Main Event in back-to-back years in 2003 and 2004 and won it all in 1995. He’s my top pick for this year’s Poker Hall of Fame class and was a nominee last year.
Phil Ivey: He’s pretty good at poker. Millions upon millions of dollars earned in cash games, eight WSOP bracelets, and a final table in last year’s Main Event are just a few of the reasons that Ivey will eventually receive a Poker Hall of Fame nod. However, “No Home Jerome,” at 34, isn’t yet old enough to run for President of the United States and didn’t record a WSOP in the money finish prior to 2000. While he’ll be a favorite of many members of the voting panel, Ivey has not yet “stood the test of time.”
Linda Johnson: How do you not elect “The First Lady of Poker” to the Poker Hall of Fame? A founding member of the Tournament Directors Association and inaugural inductee to the Women in Poker Hall of Fame, Johnson has made an indelible impact on the game in several different areas. From encouraging more women to play to co-founding Poker Gives and urging players to give back, Johnson epitomizes what a Poker Hall of Fame inductee should be. She’ll be receiving my vote this year as my second favorite candidate.
Tom McEvoy: In my opinion, McEvoy is the poster child for standing the test of time. In his third career WSOP in the money finish, he won the Main Event in 1983. He’s racked up a total of four bracelets and then promptly took down last year’s Champions Invitational, a made-for-television event that awarded a sleek new ride to its winner. McEvoy has authored a bounty of poker books including his “Championship” series and “How to Win No Limit Hold’em Tournaments.” McEvoy also lacks any character questions and will be marked on my ballot.
Daniel Negreanu: The same argument I used as to why Ivey does not warrant a nod for the Poker Hall of Fame this year holds water for Negreanu, who is 36 years old. “Kid Poker” has become one of the main faces of the entire industry through his marketable persona and owns the second largest earnings total in WPT history. He also has four bracelets, but a recent high-profile run-in with Annie Duke that included the use of the “C” word has me questioning whether he’s worthy of being an ambassador for the game.
Scotty Nguyen: Sadly, I can’t bring myself to vote for Nguyen. The only player to have won the $50,000 HORSE Championship and WSOP Main Event, Nguyen’s expertise on the felt is in a league of its own. He has eight WPT final tables and one title, but his demeanor at the HORSE Championship in 2008 remains a major black eye for the industry given the game’s precarious online legality in the United States and the tournament’s national exposure on ESPN. The fact that Nguyen still orders beer at tournaments, albeit non-alcoholic brands like O’Doul’s, continues to confound me after what happened in 2008. If Nguyen wants anyone’s vote, he’ll need to shape up.
Erik Seidel: Duke’s choice for the Poker Hall of Fame, Seidel has been the epitome of class. As she told Poker News Daily, “The guy behaves with such grace in a sport where grace is really needed. He’s always so graceful and so sportsmanlike.” I’m on the fence about Seidel’s accomplishments away from the game, as his dominance on the felts is obvious.
Sorry, but I do have to question your negative comments about Scotty Nguyen. This man has stood the test of time, played with and against the best and beat them all. He has numerous wsop bracelets and Wpt wins. He constantly makes time (both in and out of the public eye) to thank his fans on a personal level! While the 2008 HORSE event incident was surely an embarrassing moment for him, nobody felt worse about it than Scotty himself. And, more importantly, he went way beyond what was necessary in apologizing to his family, fans and poker community. In a world where professional athletes and other popular stars feel entitled to their behavior transgressions, and rarely show sincerity in their apologies, Scotty Nguyen stood before the world and wore his heartfelt emotions on his sleeve. He didn’t make excuses or pass blame anywhere but to himself. How many of us can look in the mirror and say we’ve never gone over the edge and embarrassed ourselves at least once? Always remember the classic words: to err is human, to forgive is divine!
I truly think you should reconsider your decision to exclude a true Prince of Poker from the honor he deserves!
I agree that Scotty has reached out and apologized to the fans, but his actions were pretty belligerent. It was like watching an episode of “The Sopranos” and furthered the mystique of poker as a backroom card game with sultry characters.
Scotty has undoubtedly satisfied the requirements on the felt to be in the Poker Hall of Fame. I can’t argue against that at all. However, who we put in will forever define our industry. Until he completely kicks the beer habit (even though it’s O’Doul’s) and really re-earns the respect of fans and fellow players again, he won’t be getting my vote.
Wow! What a high horse we sit on there, sir! A poker player drinking beer is now taboo. I guess soon we should all stop playing at 10pm because only “sultry characters” stay up late into the evening! For you to call for another grown man to kick “the beer habit” is pompous and downright ridiculous. And “belligerent”? One time in an illustrious and colorful carreer? I guess there are a bunch of popular players who should never be allowed into the PHoF because of their belligerent behavior at the table (and they don’t all have the obvious excuse of having imbibed too many of those evil beers!)
I’m beyond trying to convince you that Scotty deserves to be inducted. Obviously you are much too self righteous to consider that. But, I can tell you with confidence that Scotty Nguyen’s fans and most all of his peers have accepted his apology and moved on. Maybe you should stop trying to portray poker as something that it isn’t. Just take a look around a poker room once in a while, sultry characters are what makes this game so colorful.
I completely get where you’re coming from, Steve, and appreciate your responses. If you were voting on the committee, then, who among the 10 would you vote for and why? It takes 50% of the vote for someone to be inducted with a max of two people.
Well Dan, I will say that with my obvious objection regarding Scotty, I think the rest of your article is right on point. The difference though would be between Tom McEvoy and Scotty Nguyen. While I would never downplay Mr. McEvoy’s accomplishments I feel that Scotty, with an equally impressive career if not more so, has helped more to introduce poker to the public. His lovable demeanor away from the table and his antics and verbosity at the table have entertained even those that barely understand the game. The man has an infectious personality that almost compels you to end every sentence with his signature “baby” tagline. In my opinion he has done more to popularize the game, even considering the 2008 HORSE event, than Mr. McEvoy. My picks would be Dan Harrington and The Prince, baby! Lol.
Personally, I think that accomplished players should get in first over ambassadors etc. Ivey, Seidel, and Greenstein would be my choices. Put Harrington and Johnson in down the line when there are fewer high caliber players to put in. I would put in Harman before Johnson.
Dan, totally spot on with Linda Johnson. I’m so glad that people with the right perspective do the voting in poker. I think Ivey would be my #2, Seidel #3, then it’s a toss-up between Harrington, Ferguson, and Greenstein.